Hello, Login
X

Forgot Password?

Join Us

to start. Not a member? Join Today!
LinkedIn Join us on
Investment Management Information
“Bridging the theory & practice of investment management”
Email
Advanced Search →
  • Home
  • Journal
    • About
    • Subscribe to the Journal
      • Subscriptions
      • Library Subscriptions
    • Harry M. Markowitz Award
    • Submit a Paper
      • Article Guidelines
      • Practitioner’s Guidelines
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Advertising
  • Conferences
    • JOIM Conference Events
    • About
    • Membership
    • Board Members
    • Sponsorship
  • Library Access
  • Contact
  • Help

0 comments / 13/07/2014 / the JOIM / Archives, Articles, Special Issues

On the Relative Performance of Multi-Strategy and Funds of Hedge Funds

Vikas Agarwal and Jayant R. Kale

Volume 5, Number 3, Third Quarter 2007

Recently, there has been explosive growth in two products from the hedge fund industry multi-strategy (MS) funds and funds of hedge funds (FOFs), both of which offer diversification across different hedge fund strategies. In well functioning markets, both investment vehicles should offer similar returns. Over the period 1994-2004, we find that MS funds outperform FOFs on a risk-adjusted basis by 2.6% to 4.8% per year on gross-of-fee and by 3.0% to 3.6% per year on net-of-fee basis. The superior performance of MS funds continues to hold even when we control for fund characteristics such as size, management and incentive fees, and other conventional control variables. Since FOFs underperform MS funds on both net- and gross-of-fee basis, their underperformance cannot be entirely explained by their double-layered fee structure. The question then is how MS funds and FOFs can co-exist in equilibrium in view of the significant differential in performance? We suggest that investors perceive greater agency risk in the structure of MS funds relative to FOFs and therefore require greater compensation for investing in MS funds. MS funds are able to generate these higher returns because they possess greater investment flexibility and are able to invest in less liquid assets. It is also possible that MS funds generate greater returns because managers with “better” ability self-select into joining MS funds and the competition among MS funds results in the rents from superior ability being passed on to the investors in the form of better returns. Controlling for the differences in agency risk, flexibility, and fee structure between MS funds and FOFs, our results suggest that self-selection by managers with superior ability in MS funds may be the driving force behind their superior performance relative to FOFs.

0 comments… add one
Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

Next Article: Active 130/30 Extensions: Alpha Hunting at the Fund Level

Previous Article: What Every Investor Should Know About Commodities Part II: Multivariate Return Analysis

JOIM

    Library Access

    Subscribe to the Journal
    Submit a Paper
    Harry M. Markowitz Award
    Editorial Board
    Upcoming Conferences

    Edit Profile

Recent Comments

    JOIM

      About the JOIM
    • Library Access
    • Subscribe to the Journal
    • Submit a Paper
    • Editorial Board
    • Harry M. Markowitz Award
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Advertising
    • Terms and Conditions

    JOIM Conference Series

    • About
    • Upcoming Conferences
    • Membership
    • Board Members
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Terms & Conditions
    Speaker Reimbursement Policy

    Contact

    Journal Of Investment Management (JOIM)
    3658 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suite 200
    Lafayette, CA 94549
    www.joim.com

    customerservice @ joim.com
    (925) 299-7800

    Copyright 2019 — Journal Of Investment Management design by SEO Web Designers